Archive | February, 2008

Thinking Interactive Goes Mobile

28 Feb

Not that I think that many people are reading this site on a mobile device. I just wanted to try out a service called MoFuse that creates a mobile site for your website from its RSS feed.

Check it out:
http://thinkinginteractive.mofuse.mobi/

Apparently it publishes an iPhone version as well.

Update: I tried out the iPhone version (thanks Brian) and it is pretty slick, complete with those AJAX page transitions that scream Apple. Although you could just as easily open the site feed as it automatically displays in the Mac reader (without the slick transitions though).

Tabs – Coming Soon to Your Facebook Profile

26 Feb

It appears that Facebook will be adding tabs to profile pages in an effort to tidy the site up. The main driver of this appears to be the clutter of applications that have polluted most people’s profiles. Looking at the screenshots, it appears that they have decided to combine the mini-feed and the wall, which makes sense as it will provide a consolidated view of what is going on with that person over the past few hours or the past six months (depending on how active they are on Facebook).

(more…)

Obay – A Missed Opportunity

25 Feb

In the last week or so, satirical ads with some amazingly terrible stock photography for a pharmaceutical product called Obay have been popping up all over Toronto. The ads have generated considerable buzz in the blogging community (Torontoist, Buzz Canuck and NOTCOT to name a few). While I have my doubts about the overall communication strategy (I’ll reserve judgement until the big reveal), there was definitely a major opportunity missed in not taking this viral campaign online from launch. As a commenter writes on a Flickr photo of one of the ads, “I’d be interested to know more about who’s doing it, surprised there’s no website address included.”

(more…)

Ron Paul vs. Digg

12 Feb

I had been meaning to put this up for a while, but it sort of got lost in the shuffle, so it may not be as hot a topic as it was about a month ago (especially given how things have gone for Ron Paul), but I think it is interesting nonetheless. Anyways, a while back, Duncan Riley at Tech Crunch had posted an article questioning why Ron Paul stories had been buried on Digg. He put forward two scenarios, the first one being that the long rumored Digg super users had buried the Ron Paul stories, the second one being that Digg suppressed the stories to support their own agendas. While I certainly wouldn’t want to question the power of the Digg super users, I did come across something that might lead some credence to Duncan’s second theory.

Last year, a service called Subvert and Profit launched, which pays users to vote for articles and websites on Digg and StumbleUpon and videos on YouTube. Subvert and Profit’s clients pay them $2 for each vote on any of the above services, of which Subvert and Profit passes on $1 to the end user. However, in order to protect the identity of their clients as well as to throw YouTube, Digg and Stumble Upon off the trail, the user is given four random items to vote upon in addition to the item that has been paid for. Unfortunately for Subvert and Profit and its clients, this cloaking mechanism doesn’t work too well until you have reasonable scale and diversity of clients. Last month I noticed that each “mission” I received contained one Ron Paul link among a bunch of links that I would have a hard time imagining anybody paying to have bumped. Clearly Ron Paul or perhaps a fervent Ron Paul supporter had been attempting to promote these articles. I would assume that if Digg is as “committed to giving every piece of content on the web an equal shot at being the next big thing” as they say they are, they would likely have several Subvert and Profit accounts to keep an eye on who is buying votes and probably wouldn’t be too hesitant to bury articles that have been given an unfair advantage.