<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Says Integrated Agencies Don&#8217;t Understand Interactive?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewjameslockhart.com/2008/03/31/who-says-integrated-agencies-dont-understand-interactive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewjameslockhart.com/2008/03/31/who-says-integrated-agencies-dont-understand-interactive/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:58:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miron</title>
		<link>http://andrewjameslockhart.com/2008/03/31/who-says-integrated-agencies-dont-understand-interactive/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Miron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 06:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewjameslockhart.com/2008/03/31/who-says-integrated-agencies-dont-understand-interactive/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>It seems like an interesting concept but the &#039;cuteness&#039; of it all gets old quickly IMHO. I guess they&#039;re trying to be forward thinking or something but I don&#039;t see how this really fits with their own brand - which is pretty ironic for an ad agency. 

I could understand if they were doing a lot of work for their clients in the realm of social media, but their web portfolio (as per del.icio.us) seems like several micro sites without any social media integration (and I&#039;ll also note the whoreish use of Flash in their design work!).

P.S. Wikipedians need to get real and focus more on their self-imploding management/governance than elitist chastisement of particular articles. 

Miron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like an interesting concept but the &#8216;cuteness&#8217; of it all gets old quickly IMHO. I guess they&#8217;re trying to be forward thinking or something but I don&#8217;t see how this really fits with their own brand &#8211; which is pretty ironic for an ad agency. </p>
<p>I could understand if they were doing a lot of work for their clients in the realm of social media, but their web portfolio (as per del.icio.us) seems like several micro sites without any social media integration (and I&#8217;ll also note the whoreish use of Flash in their design work!).</p>
<p>P.S. Wikipedians need to get real and focus more on their self-imploding management/governance than elitist chastisement of particular articles. </p>
<p>Miron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma</title>
		<link>http://andrewjameslockhart.com/2008/03/31/who-says-integrated-agencies-dont-understand-interactive/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewjameslockhart.com/2008/03/31/who-says-integrated-agencies-dont-understand-interactive/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>&quot;conceit of the site&quot; - concept? 

Checked out the site, it&#039;s pretty cool. I got taken to the Hamster Dance page... oh the memories! The navigation is a little annoying to use though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;conceit of the site&#8221; &#8211; concept? </p>
<p>Checked out the site, it&#8217;s pretty cool. I got taken to the Hamster Dance page&#8230; oh the memories! The navigation is a little annoying to use though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Lockhart</title>
		<link>http://andrewjameslockhart.com/2008/03/31/who-says-integrated-agencies-dont-understand-interactive/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Lockhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewjameslockhart.com/2008/03/31/who-says-integrated-agencies-dont-understand-interactive/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>LOL. That&#039;s embarrassing. No more late night posts. Thanks for the heads up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL. That&#8217;s embarrassing. No more late night posts. Thanks for the heads up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: majordan</title>
		<link>http://andrewjameslockhart.com/2008/03/31/who-says-integrated-agencies-dont-understand-interactive/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>majordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewjameslockhart.com/2008/03/31/who-says-integrated-agencies-dont-understand-interactive/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>spelt? That&#039;s sic!

LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>spelt? That&#8217;s sic!</p>
<p>LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

